Organisation in development. Policy enquiries are open by email; donations are not open.Project status

Taking shape in Manchester

Freedom.
Protection.
Being heard.

Civil Liberties Action is a proposed campaigning organisation focused on people’s freedom, safety and ability to be heard. Its first two programmes address civil liberties and drug policy.

Explore the programmes

Starting from scratch in Manchester, England. Legal structure undecided. Donations are not open.

Civil libertiesDemocratic rightsMigrationDrug policyAddiction & care

Start here / A guide to CLA

Considering
getting involved?

Understand the proposed organisation, examine the work and explore what involvement could mean before deciding whether to take part.

Information first. Roles are still in development.

01 / Our proposed purpose

Different issues.
A shared purpose.

Civil Liberties Action is being developed to pursue changes that could improve many people’s lives, with particular attention to those whose experiences and concerns receive too little attention.

The founder connects the two programmes through freedom and protecting people: defending civil liberties, including the rights of refugees, and seeking drug-policy changes that recognise the circumstances of people experiencing addiction.

The founder’s starting point

People’s freedom and dignity should not depend on circumstances beyond their control.

The ambition is meaningful improvement in people’s lives, not a claim that the two issues are the same. As the organisation develops, it intends to prioritise campaigns where its limited resources have a credible opportunity to make a substantial positive difference to people’s freedom or protection. Measures of impact are still to be developed.

A note from the founder

Founder perspective

Why I’m starting CLA.

My interest in addiction and drug policy is personal. I have personal experience of addiction, including periods when it existed alongside work, responsibility and outward signs that life was going well. That has made me conscious of how easily addiction can be reduced to a stereotype, and how much may be hidden behind what other people see.

In the lobbying and policy discussions I have had so far, I have found that explaining that personal context can change the quality of the conversation. It moves the issue from an abstract label to practical questions about treatment, employment, dignity, safety and the way the law responds.

That experience is one reason I am developing Civil Liberties Action. It is a starting point, not the evidence base and not a claim to speak for everyone affected. CLA’s proposals should be tested through evidence, scrutiny and input from others.

Benjamin CollinsonFounder, Civil Liberties Action

How we will work

Founder-led to begin with. CLA is starting with policy development led by its founder. The initial intention is to develop proposals and seek opportunities to work with politicians to examine the evidence, explore practical questions and refine those proposals.

Independent oversight is the intended model. The founder has agreed in principle to lead the day-to-day work, with an independent board overseeing CLA’s direction, finances and accountability, including decisions about any payment to the founder. This is a planned arrangement: no board has been appointed. How leadership and oversight would work.

Time commitment will develop with the work. CLA may remain a small part-time project or develop into a larger part-time or full-time commitment, depending on the opportunity to make a meaningful difference and the resources available. No fixed hours or full-time role have been agreed.

Engagement, not party allegiance. The proposed approach is to discuss policies on their substance, rather than align CLA with a political party. Seeking a discussion does not imply support or endorsement. No political partnerships are claimed at this stage.

A route into policy development. Alongside discussion with politicians, CLA is developing a way for people to offer evidence, practical insight and questions about its proposals. Explore the policy-development route. Policy enquiries are now open by email. Formal involvement in setting priorities, including by people directly affected, remains to be designed; no advisory or membership arrangements are claimed.

Occasional public progress updates. CLA intends to share work completed, learning and any evidenced outcomes as the project develops, while keeping private correspondence confidential. No fixed publishing schedule is set. Read about progress updates.

02 / The proposed programmes

A shared concern for freedom and protection.

Programme one

Democracy &
civil liberties

The founder’s proposed focus is civil liberties and protection, including for refugees and people seeking asylum. The stated aims also include supporting migration, migrants’ rights and international cooperation, challenging discrimination and authoritarian politics, and engaging with legislation that affects democratic safeguards.

Proposed scope

  • Civil liberties, equal treatment and democratic participation.
  • Evidence-based scrutiny of discriminatory behaviour and authoritarian politics.
  • In the first phase, find, check, contextualise and bring wider attention to significant evidence that already exists but may have received too little attention.
  • Develop capacity for original investigations later where that becomes an effective and responsible use of resources.
  • Monitor relevant legislation and contribute evidence and policy analysis to parliamentary scrutiny, including by communicating with MPs and peers.
  • The same standard of scrutiny regardless of party, movement or political alignment.
  • Refugees, people seeking asylum, wider migrants’ rights and international cooperation.

One current example is the Representation of the People Bill. As of 1 October 2026 it has completed its Commons stages and is in the House of Lords. The Commons agreed provisions for an annual £100,000 cap on donations and other regulated transactions from overseas contributors; broader donation-cap amendments were also proposed during Commons consideration. Sources: UK Parliament, House of Commons Library and Electoral Commission.

The programme is intended to scrutinise conduct and policy rather than start from a party label. Early activity would primarily work with existing public evidence; original investigations could be developed later. Claims should be evidenced, relevant context included, subjects given an appropriate opportunity to respond, and corrections made when warranted. Legislative work would focus on clearly stated policy positions and evidence rather than party allegiance. The legal structure and permitted organisational activities remain to be settled. The website describes proposals, not a registered charity or established programme of delivery. CLA is not presented as endorsing or opposing political parties or candidates.

Contribute to this programme

Programme two

Drug policy
& addiction

The founder’s starting point is that addiction should be met with understanding and care, rather than used to define a person or judge their worth. The programme is informed in part by the founder’s personal experience of addiction and by close contact with people affected by addiction and drug policy. That experience helps shape the questions CLA asks; the policy case itself should be developed through evidence, scrutiny and input from others.

The programme’s first proposed campaign objective is to remove the specific exclusion for addiction in regulation 3 of the Equality Act 2010 (Disability) Regulations 2010. The longer-term policy objective remains drug decriminalisation with significant regulation, alongside attention to treatment and support.

First proposed campaign

Remove addiction’s special exclusion from the Equality Act disability framework. Addiction would not automatically count as a disability; instead, it could be considered under the Act’s ordinary disability test, based on the substantial and long-term effect on the individual’s day-to-day life.

What success should feel like

A person experiencing addiction should be able to talk about the problem and seek support at work without addiction being automatically excluded from consideration as a disability. Where the ordinary Equality Act disability test is met, they should be able to rely on the protections that follow from it.

The proposed reform in more detail

The immediate request. The founder's briefing proposes a government review and consultation on regulation 3, with a view to removing the categorical exclusion of addiction. It proposes considering changes to the Regulations alongside practical guidance, an impact assessment and consultation with people affected, employers, clinicians, unions and safety regulators.

What workplace support could involve. The briefings identify time for treatment, changes to hours, occupational-health support and temporary reassignment as possible adjustments. These are examples to consider where reasonable, not guaranteed entitlements in every role or circumstance. The intended outcome is to make it safer to discuss a problem and seek support, without removing conduct or safety requirements.

Employment first, not employment only. Employment is CLA's initial campaign focus. The underlying legal proposal concerns the disability framework in Great Britain: England, Wales and Scotland. The briefings also discuss access to services, but additional CLA activities in those areas remain to be agreed. Northern Ireland has separate disability-discrimination legislation.

A distinct proposal. This first campaign concerns disability discrimination. It does not propose legalising drugs or changing welfare-benefit eligibility. The programme's longer-term drug-law objectives are separate from this request.

The route described in the briefings. The proposal is to amend secondary legislation using the powers in the Equality Act, subject to legal drafting and the applicable parliamentary process. It is not presented here as an agreed government plan, a confirmed timetable or a promise of success.

Source basis: the founder's MPs' and ministerial working briefings. These documents are not published or offered for download on this website. Public references: regulation 3, the regulation-making power and HSE guidance on supporting employees. This is a description of the proposed campaign, not individual legal advice.

Proposed scope

  • Initial focus: employment. Build the public and evidential case around recruitment, retention, workplace treatment and reasonable adjustments for people whose addiction would meet the ordinary Equality Act disability test if regulation 3 did not exclude it.
  • The proposed scope includes people currently experiencing addiction, people in recovery, and people with a past addiction. Coverage would depend on the final reform and the rules on current or past disability; a history of substance use would not automatically qualify.
  • Campaign to remove or amend regulation 3 of the Equality Act 2010 (Disability) Regulations 2010. The legal objective remains removal of the special exclusion; employment is the first area in which CLA proposes to demonstrate the case for reform.
  • Develop the evidence and case for addiction to be assessed under the ordinary disability framework rather than excluded solely because the impairment is an addiction.
  • Decriminalisation of possession for personal use.
  • The design of regulation, including the separate question of lawful supply.
  • Addiction, treatment access, harm reduction and recovery support.

Current law: regulation 3 says addiction to alcohol, nicotine or any other substance is not treated as an impairment for Equality Act purposes, except where the addiction originally resulted from medically prescribed drugs or other medical treatment. Removing that exclusion would not, by itself, mean every person with an addiction automatically met the Act’s disability definition: section 6 ordinarily requires a physical or mental impairment with a substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. Related impairments, such as depression or liver disease, can already qualify even where addiction itself is excluded. Sources: Equality Act 2010 (Disability) Regulations 2010, regulation 3, Equality Act 2010, section 6 and government disability guidance.

Why employment first: Part 5 of the Equality Act covers work, including recruitment and employment. Where a person is disabled within the Act, employers have duties including protection from disability discrimination and, where the legal conditions are met, reasonable adjustments. CLA is exploring employment as the first campaign focus; this does not yet claim that an employment-first strategy is more likely to secure legislative change. Sources: Equality Act 2010, section 39 and Acas: disability discrimination.

Addiction is treatable. Genetic and environmental factors can affect risk, and addiction can impair control over drug use. No single factor determines who develops it. Sources: NHS and NIDA.

The precise regulatory model remains to be agreed. This is a campaigning proposal, not a treatment provider or an offer of individual medical advice.

Contribute to this programme

Terminology note: decriminalisation removes criminal status from an activity, usually personal possession or use in drug-policy discussions; it does not itself create lawful supply. Source: European Union Drugs Agency.

03 / Developing the organisation

The organisation
behind the work.

For people considering a future contribution or board role. Explore the intended working model and the practical questions that need answers before anyone makes a commitment.

Website first, conversations next.

The immediate priority is to develop this website into a clear information pack before approaching people about involvement. Founder-led work with independent board oversight is agreed in principle; the work sequence below is a draft for discussion, not an approved operating plan.

Proposed work sequence

Draft · for discussion

The first phase,
in practical terms.

A way to describe the work without setting fixed hours, an unfunded budget or a deadline for policy change.

  1. PrepareMake the foundations clear.

    Develop the website, explain the intended governance model and draft role descriptions and a modest starting budget. Separate settled decisions from questions for the founder and a future board.

    Proposed outputs: a checked information website, an operating outline and costed options. No recruitment date or approved timetable for the first-phase work is set.

  2. Develop & reviewDefine a manageable piece of work.

    Set out a specific question within the existing programmes, the proposed work, public sources and the questions still needing examination. Record evidence that challenges a proposal as well as evidence that supports it.

    Possible outputs: a referenced briefing, a record of limitations and a set of questions for contributors. Discussions would depend on interest and a functioning contact route; none are promised here.

  3. ReviewDecide what the work justifies next.

    Record completed work, substantive feedback and any evidenced outcomes alongside the time and costs involved. Keep CLA’s contribution separate from wider developments and other people’s work.

    Proposed output: a short review to inform whether to continue, adjust, pause or expand. Neither growth nor a full-time founder role is assumed.

How progress would be reported

The intended working model

No board appointed

Different ways
to contribute.

Helping with a piece of work is different from taking responsibility for the organisation. The proposed roles should be clear before a commitment is discussed.

Founder-led delivery
The founder would lead research, policy development, relationships and administration within an agreed plan, budget and delegated limits. The time commitment remains open.
Independent board oversight
The intended board would retain final oversight of direction, finances, risks and accountability. Unconflicted members would consider any founder appointment or pay without the founder taking part in those decisions. This is not a group appointed merely to endorse the founder’s decisions.
Policy contributions
People could offer published evidence, review a draft or raise practical questions without taking a board role. No donation, personal disclosure or agreement with every proposal is required.
What needs to be clear before a formal role is agreed?

The role’s responsibilities and decision-making powers; expected time, including preparation; appointment process and term; support, expenses and any payment arrangements; and the legal duties and conflict rules attached to the eventual structure. Those details are not yet settled. No role is being offered or application collected through this website.

For a possible board, the mix of experience to consider includes finance, governance, evidence review and knowledge of the proposed work. This is a starting point for discussion, not a final selection specification.

Reference for a possible charity in England and Wales: the Charity Commission’s guidance on finding and appointing trustees (CC30) covers role descriptions, responsibilities, skills, time commitments and term limits. Checked 2 October 2026. CLA’s legal structure and charitable eligibility remain undecided.

What remains before the website is made fully public?

The domain has been registered and the policy mailbox is working. The hosting and email privacy arrangements are now described on this page. The founder’s personal account and the factual notes remain subject to a final publication review before search-engine indexing is enabled.

A public information website is separate from making formal appointments or opening fundraising. Those activities require their own agreed arrangements. Private working documents and correspondence are not provided for download.

Explore the information now. Any future invitation would be a separate conversation about scope, responsibilities and fit—not an assumption that reading the site means agreeing to take part.

04 / Get involved

Work with us.
Support the work.

Explore policy contributions or future support for either programme. For an overview of leadership and independent oversight, read about the intended roles.

For politicians, practitioners & the public

Connect with policy development.

CLA’s initial focus is founder-led policy development, with the intention of working with politicians and their staff. Researchers, practitioners, organisations and members of the public would also be able to offer evidence, practical insight or questions.

You do not need to agree with every proposal to take part in a discussion. No donation, party allegiance or endorsement is required or implied.

Policy enquiries — open by email

Email [email protected]. You can also use the browser-only builder below to prepare a draft before sending it yourself.

Explore ways to contribute

For future supporters

Support our work.

The planned donation routes will let supporters choose either Democracy & civil liberties or Drug policy & addiction.

Programme budgets, funding terms and arrangements for receiving donations are still being developed. Explore the demonstration below to see how the proposed choice would work.

Donations — preview only

No donations are open. The demonstration takes no payment or pledge, creates no subscription and saves no details.

Explore donation options

A route into the work

Policy enquiries open

Connect with policy development.

Offer evidence, help examine a proposal or raise a practical question. The intended route is for politicians and their teams, researchers, practitioners, organisations and anyone with relevant insight—including people directly affected.

Ways to contribute

Evidence & research
Point to published research, data or other public sources. Explain what the material addresses and any limitations.
Drafting & practical review
Offer to read a draft, identify unanswered questions or discuss how a proposal could work in practice, including possible unintended effects.
Questions & discussion
Suggest a policy question or a conversation. Different perspectives are welcome; agreement with every proposal is not required.

Participation without personal disclosure.

You do not need to describe your health, history, party membership, voting intentions or other private circumstances to contribute. The builder below asks for no name or email, accepts no attachments and sends nothing to CLA. Please do not put medical records, private correspondence or information about another person into it or into an initial policy email.

If lived experience or other sensitive information may be relevant, contact CLA first in general terms so an appropriate way of handling it can be agreed before you send details.

CLA remains founder-led. This is not a membership application, a promise of a role or an endorsement. Read how we will work.

Prepare a policy enquiry.

Browser-only drafting tool. Prepare a non-sensitive draft and copy or save it yourself. Nothing typed here is transmitted to CLA. To send an enquiry, use the policy email address below.

Policy email: [email protected]

Choose a topic and contribution

Use an example for now. Do not include names, contact details, personal health information or private correspondence. Maximum 1,500 characters.

A public web address beginning with https:// or http://. The preview will not open or fetch it.

Nothing has been sent. This is a browser-only drafting tool, not a contact form.

06 / Transparency from the start

What is agreed.
What is still in development.

Organisation

Starting in Manchester

CLA is being developed in Manchester, England. Founder-led day-to-day work with independent board oversight is agreed in principle. No legal entity has been established or board appointed. The founder has registered civillibertiesaction.org.uk and opened [email protected] as the project’s public policy contact. Legal structure, name checks beyond domain registration and detailed governance rules remain to be settled. No charity registration or tax status is claimed.

Programme funding

Clear terms before payment

Before fundraising opens, CLA needs to explain how each programme is funded, whether gifts are restricted, how shared costs are handled, and what happens if plans change.

Activity & reporting

Plans are not impact claims

Occasional public updates are planned, distinguishing activity from evidence of outcomes and keeping private correspondence confidential. No campaign results or partnerships are claimed. Budgets and detailed measures of impact remain to be developed.

07 / Progress & learning

Follow the work.

Occasional updates on what CLA is doing, what it is learning and what remains unresolved. No fixed publishing schedule, and no assumption that activity alone means impact.

Project development

Development note

Prepared

A founder-led start.

CLA is taking shape as a founder-led project. The initial intention is to research and refine policy proposals and seek opportunities for discussion with politicians and their staff. Broader participation remains an ambition as the organisation develops.

The time commitment is still open. CLA may remain a small part-time project or grow where the work, potential impact and resources justify it. No fixed hours, paid appointment or salary have been agreed.

The founder has agreed in principle to lead day-to-day work with an independent board providing final organisational oversight, including decisions about any payment to the founder. This records an intended governance model, not an appointed board.

The next development priority is to make the website an information pack for people considering involvement, before approaching them about roles. A draft first-phase outline now sets out possible work and open decisions for review; it is not an adopted plan.

Still to settle

The domain civillibertiesaction.org.uk has been registered and [email protected] is working as the public policy contact. Hosting and email privacy information has been added for the first deployment. Legal structure, board appointments, detailed governance rules and budgets remain to be settled. Policy enquiries are open by email; donations are not open.

What this records: organisational decisions and website development, not campaign results or political endorsements.

Public progress. Private correspondence.

Private letters, emails and sensitive personal information will be kept out of these updates. Non-public feedback will only be summarised with permission and without private identifying details. Contact or discussion will not be presented as an endorsement.

08 / Questions

Questions about
the project.

Why bring these two programmes together?

The founder’s purpose is to pursue changes that protect freedom and improve people’s lives, with particular attention to people whose experiences are often overlooked. The programmes address different issues; their connection is that shared purpose, not a claim that addiction and forced displacement are equivalent. Each will need its own objectives, evidence and way of assessing impact.

Is Civil Liberties Action a registered charity?

No. This project is starting from scratch in Manchester, England. A legal entity has not yet been established and no charitable registration is claimed. Civil Liberties Action remains a working name. The structure and status will be stated accurately as the organisation develops.

Who would lead CLA and oversee its work?

Day-to-day leadership. The intended model is for the founder to lead research, policy development, relationships and administration. The proposed division of responsibilities would give the founder room to carry out the work within a plan, budget and decision-making limits agreed with the board.

Independent oversight. An independent board would oversee CLA’s direction, finances, risks and accountability, retaining final organisational oversight rather than acting only as an advisory group. Its powers and the founder’s delegated responsibilities would need to be set out in the eventual governing arrangements.

Independent decisions about pay. Under the intended model, any decision about appointing or paying the founder would be made by independent, unconflicted board members. The founder would not take part in those board discussions or decisions. A paid role would still need to be justified, affordable and lawfully authorised. Read how paid work would be considered.

Agreed in principle, not yet in place. No board has been appointed. The legal structure, board composition, appointment process and detailed rules remain to be settled. No trustee or director appointment, employment contract, working hours or salary has been agreed for the founder.

If CLA is established as a charity in England and Wales, delegating decisions does not remove the trustee board’s responsibility. The Charity Commission recommends clear decision-making limits and reporting arrangements. Read the Commission’s decision-making guidance (CC27). Governance source checked 2 October 2026. This describes a planned model, not an adopted constitution.

How can I contribute to policy development?

The route is to offer published evidence, review a draft, discuss practical implications or suggest a policy question. It is not limited to politicians or donors, and you do not need to share personal circumstances or agree with every proposal. Explore the policy-development route.

Policy enquiries are open at [email protected]. The on-page builder is optional and browser-only: it helps prepare a draft but does not transmit anything. Please avoid sensitive personal information in an initial email; if lived experience is relevant, make first contact in general terms so an appropriate way of handling it can be agreed.

Can I donate to one programme only?

That is the intended design. This preview has a separate option for each programme, but neither takes payments. Before fundraising opens, the fundraising wording and accounting arrangements need to establish whether a gift is legally restricted to a programme or is an unrestricted gift expressing a preference. Those are not the same thing.

For charities in England and Wales, the Charity Commission explains that money raised for a specific project or aim becomes restricted and must be spent on what the appeal states. Read the Commission’s fundraising guidance.

What would donations pay for?

Programme budgets and eligible activities have not been agreed. Possible budget items include research, specialist advice, producing briefings and organisational costs. Defined paid work, including the founder’s time, may also be considered; no role, hours or salary have been agreed.

Before receiving money, each programme page should state what it will fund and whether the budget includes a share of administration, payment-processing or other support costs. This website makes no promise that every pound will be spent directly on front-line activity.

Does the drug-policy programme provide treatment?

No treatment service has been established as part of this proposal. The planned programme concerns campaigning on drug policy and addiction. Any future treatment, referral or support service would need its own confirmed arrangements; this website should not be used for individual medical advice.

Would disability protection permit unsafe work or drug driving?

No. The founder's proposal concerns eligibility for disability protection, not permission to use illegal drugs at work, breach drug-driving law, or disregard lawful workplace safety requirements. It does not propose immunity from disciplinary action or dismissal.

Under the existing disability framework, employers must consider reasonable adjustments where the duty applies. Where unfavourable treatment results from something arising from a disability, section 15 includes a test of whether the treatment is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. This is not a general defence to every kind of discrimination, and calling something a safety issue does not automatically make dismissal lawful. Sources: Equality Act, section 15, Acas: objective justification and HSE: reasonable adjustments.

HSE guidance describes support for employees with drug or alcohol problems alongside risk management, including a possible temporary move away from safety-critical duties. That is different from assuming that asking for help makes someone unsafe. Read HSE's guidance on supporting employees.

Prescription status alone does not determine safety: prescribed and over-the-counter medicines can also make driving unsafe. In Great Britain, drug-driving offences include driving while unfit and exceeding specified drug limits, subject to the applicable medical defence. Read GOV.UK's drug-driving guidance.

The proposal includes current addiction, recovery and past addiction. Section 6(4) provides for past disability under the existing Act, but how a reform would apply to past addiction needs legal review. Read the disability definition and past-disability provisions. These notes explain the proposed scope and relevant current law, not anyone's individual legal position. Safety sources checked 1 October 2026.

How does campaigning fit with charity status?

The legal structure remains undecided. In England and Wales, charities can campaign in support of their charitable purposes, but cannot have a political purpose in its own right or support a political party or candidate. The actual proposed activities need review before charitable status is assumed. Read the Charity Commission’s guidance.

Privacy, hosting and policy enquiries

Who is responsible. Civil Liberties Action is a project being developed by Benjamin Collinson in Manchester, England, and is not a registered charity or separate legal entity. Benjamin Collinson is currently responsible for this website and the policy mailbox. Privacy questions can be sent to [email protected].

Website hosting. This website is intended to be hosted on Cloudflare Pages. The site code contains no advertising pixels, mailing-list service or payment processing, and it does not use browser storage to retain enquiry drafts or donation selections. Cloudflare nevertheless processes technical information when visitors request the site, which can include IP addresses, traffic-routing data and system-configuration information. CLA uses this processing for the legitimate interests of making the website available, secure and reliable. Read Cloudflare’s privacy policy and Cloudflare’s data-processing information.

The enquiry builder. The builder works in your browser. Text entered into it is not transmitted to CLA, and the page has no upload facility. Copying or saving a draft creates a copy under your control. The website itself does not register an enquiry: an enquiry reaches CLA only if you send an email.

Policy email. If you email [email protected], CLA will use the contact details and content you provide to read, respond to and manage the enquiry, and where relevant to develop or review policy work. For ordinary correspondence, CLA relies on legitimate interests in receiving relevant enquiries, corresponding with people who contact the project and keeping proportionate records of that work. The mailbox is provided through Zoho Mail. Zoho publishes information about its Mail privacy and data-centre arrangements, privacy practices and service-specific sub-processors.

Sensitive information. You can contribute to policy development without disclosing health information, political affiliation, voting intentions or other sensitive personal information. Please do not send medical records, detailed sensitive information or information about another person in an initial email. If lived experience or other sensitive material is genuinely relevant, contact CLA first in general terms. If sensitive information is sent without being requested, access will be limited and it will be deleted where it is not needed.

Retention. Ordinary policy-enquiry emails will normally be kept for up to 12 months after the last substantive correspondence. They may be kept longer where there is a specific reason—for example, an ongoing piece of policy work, a dispute or a necessary record of a material contribution. Any longer retention should be limited to what is needed and reviewed.

Sharing and international processing. CLA does not sell or rent personal information. Information may be processed by the service providers needed to host the website and provide email, and may be shared where necessary to handle the matter you contacted CLA about or where the law requires it. Cloudflare operates a global network and may process technical data internationally; its data-processing documentation describes its transfer safeguards. The CLA mailbox uses Zoho’s European service, while Zoho publishes information about the group entities and sub-processors involved in providing its services.

Your rights. Depending on the circumstances, data-protection law may give you rights to ask for access to your personal information, correction, deletion or restriction, and to object to processing based on legitimate interests. To exercise a right or ask a privacy question, email [email protected]. You can also complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

Other websites and future services. External reference links open other websites with their own privacy information. No mailing list or payment service is connected to this site. If CLA later adds forms, analytics, newsletters, fundraising or other services, this notice will be reviewed before those uses begin. Privacy information reviewed 2 October 2026 against ICO guidance on the right to be informed.

Sources and scope of the factual notes

The founder has confirmed Manchester, England as the project’s base, so the charity-law notes refer to England and Wales. These notes are general information, not a legal opinion or a determination that the proposal qualifies for charity status. Health and refugee references support the factual context, not an endorsement of the proposed policy objectives. Sources checked 1 October 2026:

  1. Charity Commission: campaigning and political activity (CC9).
  2. Charity Commission: fundraising and restricted funds (CC20).
  3. Charity Commission: surplus funds in specific-purpose appeals.
  4. European Union Drugs Agency: decriminalisation terminology.
  5. Equality Act 2010 (Disability) Regulations 2010: regulation 3 (addictions).
  6. Equality Act 2010: section 6 disability definition.
  7. GOV.UK: guidance on the Equality Act disability definition.
  8. NHS: addiction, causes and treatment.
  9. NIDA: drug addiction, risk factors and impaired control.
  10. UNHCR: refugees and forced displacement.
  11. UK Parliament: Representation of the People Bill and current passage.
  12. House of Commons Library: progress of the Representation of the People Bill.
  13. Electoral Commission: donation-cap amendments briefing.
  14. Equality Act 2010: section 15, discrimination arising from disability.
  15. Acas: objective justification.
  16. HSE: reasonable adjustments and workplace safety.
  17. HSE: supporting employees with drug or alcohol problems.
  18. GOV.UK: drugs and driving, the law.

Preview only

Your example selection.

Programme
Amount
Frequency

No donation has been taken, no subscription has been created and no selection has been saved. Live checkout will only be added after the receiving organisation and programme-funding terms are confirmed.