On the Record: Robert Jenrick — lethal force in the Channel

CLA · On the Record

← Back to On the Record

Robert Jenrick — lethal force in the Channel

Role at the time and now: Reform UK MP for Newark and the party’s Treasury spokesperson

“What we are going to do, and we’re the only political party that has the courage to say this, is deploy the Royal Marines into the Channel. If they need to use lethal force, then they’ll be able to do so.”

What was said

In a TalkTV interview broadcast on 12 October 2026, Robert Jenrick said a Reform UK government would deploy Royal Marines to the English Channel to take small boats back to France and permit lethal force if needed. He said that allowing force would end the crossings “in just a few days”.

Context, qualification and response

Jenrick also said lethal force was “obviously not what we want to see happen”. He said the preferred outcome was for people to be picked up from the boats “in a sensible and reasonable way” and taken to France.

On 13 October, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said Jenrick had been “utterly misconstrued”. Farage said force would not be used routinely against migrants and framed the proposal as self-defence: British personnel could respond if fired upon. “If it is, force will be met with force,” he said.

Defence readiness minister Luke Pollard called the proposal “disgusting and illegal”, saying British forces do not shoot unarmed civilians and cannot accept an illegal order. That is an attributable ministerial criticism, not a court judgment or other legal finding.

Evidence trail

Evidence status

Attributable and contemporaneously preserved. The original broadcaster’s post identifies the clip. The full wording and surrounding qualification were reproduced by contemporaneous reporting, alongside the party leader’s correction.

Legal status

This record concerns political speech and a proposed use of military force. It is not enacted policy. It does not report a criminal allegation, charge, conviction or administrative finding against Jenrick. Pollard’s description of the proposal as illegal is his stated view, not an adjudication. Inclusion here is not an allegation of illegality.

Last reviewed: 13 October 2026


Get free CLA evidence and campaign updates: join the CLA briefing.